Raising Refuge by Robbie Michael is a student housing project asking how architecture can support dignity, community and temporary refuge.
The project needs a careful frame. It deals with vulnerable people, temporary accommodation and public responsibility, so the value sits in the design judgement rather than dramatic language.
Watch: Architecture Social video
This Architecture Social video adds useful context before the practical guidance below.
Project overview
Robbie graduated from Ravensbourne University London with a first-class BA (Hons) Architecture degree. His final-year project challenges isolated models of temporary accommodation and asks how housing can help people connect with a wider urban community.
The proposal responds to the debate around the Bibby Stockholm barge by looking at an alternative: temporary housing that is integrated, humane and connected to education, workshops, green space and support networks.
What the project tries to change
- Temporary accommodation is treated as part of the city rather than an isolated holding place.
- Communal spaces are used to support contact, learning and shared routines.
- Living units are designed with flexibility so different household needs can be accommodated.
- Workshops and education spaces are built into the project rather than added as afterthoughts.
- Technology and environmental performance support daily life without becoming the whole story.
Why dignity matters in the brief
A refuge project is not only a housing calculation. It has to consider privacy, safety, orientation, access to support and the way residents meet neighbours without being forced into exposure.
That is where the architecture has to be judged carefully. A strong scheme should make life more stable for people who may already be dealing with uncertainty.
Design evidence to make clear
- How residents arrive, orientate themselves and access support.
- Which spaces are private, shared or public.
- How green space supports daily life rather than acting as decoration.
- Where workshops, education and community facilities sit in relation to housing.
- How the scheme avoids isolation while still protecting privacy and dignity.
Those details matter because a socially focused project can sound convincing in words while still being vague in plan. The portfolio has to show the design choices behind the ethics.
Portfolio lesson
For students, socially focused projects are strongest when the ethics and the architecture are both visible. Explain the human problem, then show the plan, section, programme and material decisions that respond to it.
Showcase a socially focused project
Architecture Social can feature student projects that handle public responsibility, housing, care, migration or community with evidence and restraint.
- Explain the social context without turning it into a hook.
- Show the programme and spatial decisions that respond to the brief.
- Be clear about who uses the project and what support they need.
- Use portfolio images that help the reader understand the proposal quickly.
Architecture Social view
Stephen’s recruiter view is that projects about social impact have to earn their claims. It is not enough to say architecture can help. The portfolio has to show how the design creates better choices, safer routines or more useful spaces.
Next step
Browse more student project showcases, read the portfolio guide, or submit a project that handles a social brief with care.
Add a comment